The chart compare number of Japanese tourists has travelled from 1985-1995 year period, whereas the graph illustrates the data of Australia’s average share of Japanese tourist market. Overall, the number of Japanese tourists visiting climbed, while Australia’s share went up as well.
According to the bar chart, the number of tourists in Japan was 5 million since 1985. Then, the number increased in the following years. The number reached almost 6 million and 7 million in 1986 and 1987 respectively. Fortunately, the data continuously rose until it dropped slightly to 11 million in 1991. Then, [beginning from 1992, the number surged in an upward trend tremendously.
As we can see in the graph, the Japanese tourists has travelled much more, for the number was soared, from two percent to 5 percent from 1985 to 1988. Unfortunately, the dividend declined to less than 5 million and then further rocketed from exceeding 5 million into just more than 6 million from 1989 to 1993. Until 1993, the percentage leveled off slightly to exactly 6 million.
- The diagram below shows the steps in the process of manufacturing yogurt. 64
- The diagram below explains the process of recycling plastic bottles for new uses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Because of the busy pace of modern life, many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world. Discuss the effects lack of experience with and understanding of nature can have on children as they grow up. 56
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...d slightly to 11 million in 1991. Then, [beginning from 1992, the number surged i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9307441464 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6554803044 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264834785713 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111363951218 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133508888068 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208079684278 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160984271762 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.