The given bar graphs compare the spent hours on the job per week by industrial workers in four different countries in Europe which are France, Denmark, Sweden, and the UK in 2002. It can be seen that there were conglomerations in 36-40 hours among three countries, except for France.
To begin with working hours in France, the percentages were usually below 20 except for two categories which were 31-35 and 36-40 hours. The values of these differences were just over 50% and approximately 35%, respectively. Other prominent statistics belong to the UK which means working hours are quite low compared to others apart from the last three categories. In addition, the highest percentage of spending 50 hours or more per week was seen in the UK.
When it comes to Sweden and Denmark, there were fluctuations. While 36-40 hours had the highest percentage in both, Sweden had almost twice Denmark's amounts in some categories, such as 15-20 and 21-30.
In overview, as there were similarities, there were also features that cannot be evaluated on a common denominator.
- The chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video 84
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What do you think can be done to solve this problem Support you opinion with reasons and examples from your own knowledge and experienc 67
- The chart below shows information about different species of birds observed in Woodchuck county at different times of the year 61
- WATER CONSUMPTIONThe graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, apart from, except for, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06779661017 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76172385369 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3832958895 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138207930466 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564217849262 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570490996477 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782450674996 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563705727877 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.