The given circular and linear representations highlight the information about the percentage of money spent by an average family on two types of restaurants: fast food and sit down during the period of 30 years.
Overall, it is evident that most of the people had preferred to spend more on restaurant meals as compared to home cooking.
It can be seen that during the year 1970, people had spent 10% of money on restaurant meals. However, it had been increased with 5% in the year: 1980. Comparing the percentage of restaurant meals in the year 1990 with the home cooking was decreasing with the increase in restaurant meals.
As far as trend was concerned, fast food and sit down restaurant meals had equally been eaten by the people. However, both had slightly inclined upto the year 1980. After that, sit down meals was reached at the peak with approximately 90 meals per year.
- Some people think that museums and art galleries should concentrate on the history and art of their own country rather than the works of art of other parts of the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The diagram below show how glass containers,such as bottles , are produced and recycled. 73
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past What are the reasons for this What measures can be taken to fix this 61
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past. What are the reasons for this? What measures can be taken to fix this? 67
- The graph below show the weekly earning of men and women in euros for the 16 59 age groups as per their education level 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78431372549 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6359242944 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0835361353 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278449831088 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119950994241 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897772347338 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16695860791 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602225409766 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.