The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Write at least 150 words.
The charts demonstrate the water percentage used in six distinct regions of the world for discrete purposes. In general, all the charts have a similarity that the biggest percentage was allocated to agricultural usage except for North America and Europe.
More specifically, the three areas Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia had approximately the identical distribution for three different purposes which are industrial use, agricultural use, and domestic use. Whereas, North America and Europe share the same distribution, as they are the industriliazed countries, most of the usage were in industry. Furthermore, Central Asia had not only the most 88 percentage of water used in agriculture, but also the least amount of water used in domesitc (5 percent). Additionally, South America had the most usage of water in domestic.
Moreover, we can divide the six different regions into two categories: the first one being the industrially dominant which was represented by North America and Europe, the scond one was agriculturally dominant represented by all the other fours South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 67 | view |
2023-09-08 | Eshana Pokhrel | 67 | view |
2023-09-07 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- ELTS 10 Test 3 Writing task 1 The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 93
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of our 79
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46892655367 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05587574747 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570621468927 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1069154352 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174252169515 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961819640154 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806031188097 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126732113866 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736055600083 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.