The bar charts compare water usage purposes around the world on the examples of North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and South-East Asia. It can be clearly seen that, water usage for agricultural purpose takes the greatest proportion in 4 of 6 geographical regions.
If we approach comparison by the purposes, we can see that industrial usage of water in 3 regions: South America, Africa and Central Asia records its smallest proportion (respectively 10%, 7% and 5%), while agricultural use plays dominant role in all of them showing almost the same level by percentages 71%, 84% and 88%. The similar numbers also appears in South-East Asia in the water consumption percentages (81%). However, the smallest proportion here is the domestic purpose, which is just 5% more than industrial usage (7%).
The industrial purpose of water usage both in North America and Europe shows similarity taking the greatest proportion (respectively 48% and 53%). Domestic use in Europe records a quarter following after agricultural usage. The numbers here are not differing much from those in North America. Thus, domestic use is just 2% less, while agricultural usage is bit higher (39%) in Europe.
In conclusion, we can say that most of the water reserves in the world are used for the agricultural and industrial purposes.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: water
The bar charts compare water water usage purposes around the world on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... the water consumption percentages 81%. However the smallest proportion here is the dom...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...st 2% less, while agricultural usage is bit higher 39% in Europe. In conclusion...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18981481481 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82113918536 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8509259197 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163058080056 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700132192638 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397185982591 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115099877175 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022050492682 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.