The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts illustrates the percentage of British students at one university in the UK that are able to talk English in addition to other languages in the years 2000 and 2010. It measures in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the number of students that talk only English has raised up to 5% in the years 2000 and 2010 (30% to 35%) in addition to a change in rate of other languages.
At the beginning, in the years 2000 the majority of undergraduates only spoke Britain was 30% and this rate has risen 5% in the year 2010 according to the charts (35%). Due to the mix of culture there are foreign students that only speak their own language for example, French and Spanish whose rate decreased in the years 2000 and 2010 (15% to 10% / 20% to 10%), while the ones that only spoke German remained the same (10%).
However, educators that speak another language besides English increased in percentage of 5 from the year 2000 to 2010. In addition to that, some undergraduates speak 3 languages including English and this growth rate had also accelerated from 10% to 15% (2000 and 2010).
At the end, the Britain students that spoke other languages in addition to English has increased in rate during the years by approximately 5% (2000 and 2010). In contrast of speaking only one foreign language.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting that main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...s by approximately 5% 2000 and 2010. In contrast of speaking only one foreign language. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of speaking only one foreign language.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, so, while, for example, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66379310345 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5671909793 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456896551724 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7854725229 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300515506052 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149884315519 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102859562769 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220911770579 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708298075824 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.