You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:
The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The provided two pie charts represent an overview of the percentage of British students able to speak languages other than English in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that Spanish, Another language and Two other languages depicted an upward trend; whereas, No other language and french shown a downward trend, and German remained stable in the given periods.
Spanish only rose from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010, and it was the highest percentages of languages, which were spoken by Britisher students. Similarly, the percentage of Another language and Two other language increased by 5% between 2000 and 2010.
Meanwhile, No other language was the second highest language spoken by British students in 2000 and it was 20%, but it declined by 10% during the after ten years. An equally, French was spoken by 15% in 2000 and decreased to reach at 10% in 2010. As opposed, the percentage of German language remained constantly during the ten year and it was 10%.
- Many goverments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 84
- Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons and the solutions for this situation? 78
- Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and that people must limit the use of energy in their daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do so. What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to p 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51502711607 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9981446733 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207901044211 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113385392456 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640309880427 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147002825244 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060717056611 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.