the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the rate of British learners able to speak languages other than English from a university in England between 2000 and 2010.
It is clear that Spanish was the most popular second language for British students in both two years. Additionally, the percentage of students who can speak German only as other language remained unchanged over the period shown.
In 2000, the rate of British students able to speak Spanish only was highest, at 30%, while the figure for people communicating by just English was noticeably lower, at 20%. Meanwhile, the proportions of learners who can speak French only or another language were the same, at 15%. In addition, 10% of total students from that university were the figures for individuals able to speak German only or two other languages.
In 2010, the percentage of British students speaking Spanish beside native language gradually rose to 35%, whereas the figures for students able to communicate another language and two other languages witness a small increase, by 5%. Moreover, three other groups had the same figure and stood at 10%.
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- The bar chart below shows the reasons for internet usage among British adults(2001) 89
- Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 82
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 30
- the charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of the world.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11049723757 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57184545806 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.364939565 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450143020786 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204656904413 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952331841496 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29751916639 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837794826493 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.