The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts illustrate the competence in speaking foreign language of British tertiary students in proportion, between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the charts is that the number of students who could speak only Spanish accounted for the most proportion in the both years.
In detail, there was a negligible increase in the proportion of speaking only Spanish students, by 5%, from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010. As same as speaking only Spanish students, the percentages of students who were able to speak twor language and another language also went up by 5%, from 10% to 15% and 15% to 20% respectively. Regarding to students speaking no other language, in 2000, while the percentage was the second most, at 20%, however, it halved in 2010 which was equal to students speaking Frech only and German only.
A noticeable information here is the students who speak only German maintained the proportion in the both two years, which is the lowest percentage, at 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-06 | do thu trang | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- Many museums charge for admission while the others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not only reasons why some people should learn a foreign a language Discuss both these views and give your 73
- In a number of countries some people thinks it s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 67
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89820359281 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6848793005 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.5826547141 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284390691211 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156328054308 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342036332431 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179870574088 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416967323986 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.