The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of British students who could speak six distinct other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
It is obvious that the percentage of three groups of languages increased, two groups declined, and the remained group leveled off. First no other language and French only decreased in 2010 and second German only group that did not change by 2010. Most of the students liked to learn Spanish only.
As can be seen, the pupils have more tendency to learn another language in addition to English. Hence, the rate of no other language decreased by exactly 10 percent in 2010 to 10 percent. The German-only group did not change and leveled off in 2010 by 10 percent. The other four groups rose to 15, 20, 35, and 15 by only 5 percent from 10, 15, 30, and 10 in 2010. The undergraduates who have been taught Spanish language were more than others and this language has very appeal among them.
In conclusion, native students have liked to learn another language in that university. Not only did the Spanish language have lots of fans for learning but also, another language group located in the second place that was increased in 2010.
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 78
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable be shared freely Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online whitout paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ercent from 10, 15, 30, and 10 in 2010. The undergraduates who have been taught Spa...
^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'appealed'.
Suggestion: appealed
... than others and this language has very appeal among them. In conclusion, native stu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73300970874 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40644048176 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7804639497 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200776793083 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917456144045 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853288875496 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161647867956 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107335260908 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.