the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who where able to speak other languages in addition English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of British particular university’s pupils who could talk other languages expect English in 2000 and 2010.
According to the charts, Spanish was the language used by around 32% of total students in both 2000 and 2010. Pupils who were not bilingual accounted for 20% in 2000, and it slowly fell to 20% in 2010. While only 10% of students knew two other languages by the time of 2000, 30% of them are able to understand in Spanish at this moment, and both rates were increased by 5% in 2010.
German contributed for 10%, which remained unchanged, but there was a little rise for “another language” that was 15% in 2000, and rose to 20% by 2010. In the first chart, there was half the amount of Spanish speaker for French, and then gradually decreased by 5% in 2010.
In conclusion, as pie charts tell, Spanish was the popular language among the university students.
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be a good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76878176217 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3707259874 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233735588717 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118549485493 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651960236874 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153598280116 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734627791021 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.