The given bar charts illustrates the percentage of British students can speak other languages based on their native English speaker at a university in England in the year 2000 and 2010.
It is interesting to note that the ability to speak foreign languages of students increase considerably as well as the number of students could not speak any language except English also have a significant decline in the period time of 10 years.
Over the decade, the proportion of students did know any language unless their mother language decreased a half from 20% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. Similarly, the number of students could use French as a second language dropped by 5% from 15% to 10% over the 10 years.
In 2000, the portion for students able to use Spanish, Another language and from two other languages only had 30%, 20% and 15% respectively. But these number rose by 5% in 2010 for each. Interestingly, 10% is the unchanged statistic of proportion of students could use German addition to English over the decade from 2000 to 2010.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other language decreased a half from 20% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. Similarly, the n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, similarly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78212290503 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66750270385 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3723046779 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287371830156 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144134127197 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863185866345 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195874713253 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793091331457 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.