The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts reveal the percentages of British students who acquired other languages except English at one university in England in 2000 and 2010. Overall, it is obvious that the largest population reported by those who could speak Spanish, while the minimum represented by German only group in the both selected years.
Over 2000, the most conspicuous thing was that British students who can speak Spanish took up the greatest proportion (30%) of the pie chart. Followed by those English only students, the figure constituted 20% and was the second largest sector. However, students acquiring French or another language shared the same percentage as 15% which can be also reflected by those knowing German or two other languages (10%).
Nevertheless, things had changed over one decade in 2010, albeit to the situation that Spanish only students still represented the most (35%). There were two increasing tendencies in the figures for those speaking one or two other languages, with 20% and 15% respectively. Last but not least, the proportions of French, German, Spanish only groups were the smallest, all taking up 10% among all students investigated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. Discuss both these views and give your 78
- The first below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 73
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the 55
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1981 and 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68086318379 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.510667956 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294510516865 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133735850514 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120961087341 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221491865827 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981686311221 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.