The given two pie charts explain the results of a survey carried out by Parkway hotel on 100 visitors to rate their customer service in 2005 and 2010.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the hotel's service had made a huge improvement with an increase in the percentage of guests who voted excellently and good over the period.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that half of the visitors were satisfied with the hotel's customer service in the initial year, whereas only 17 percents were satisfied in the final year. The tourists who gave good ranking had been increased by 25 percents from the former year. There was a large difference between an excellent rating of two different years as 5 percents in 2005 and 28 percents in 2010 respectively.
Shifting to the remaining data, the poor rating was 21 percents in the former year and remained only 12 percents in the later year. The very poor rating had been decreased from 15 percents to 4 percents in later year.
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 78
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 78
- The table below gives information about the percentage of adults who paid for admission to various entertainment events in five nations 83
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that changing jobs periodically is good what is your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hotels'' or 'hotel's'?
Suggestion: hotels'; hotel's
...of the visitors were satisfied with the hotels customer service in the initial year wh...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ained only 12 percents in the later year The very poor rating had been decreased ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70857142857 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54382646052 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 175.0 22.4926829268 778% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 824.0 112.824112599 730% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 175.0 22.9334400587 763% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.0 5.23603664747 325% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267876847399 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.267876847399 0.103423049105 259% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185376060517 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128808205052 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 88.3 13.2329268293 667% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -89.23 61.2550243902 -146% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 69.2 10.3012195122 672% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.22 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.75 8.06136585366 195% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 72.0 10.9970731707 655% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.