The first graph, a bar graph reveals the percentage of adult purposes for studies, and the pie chart communicates the percentage of how the amount of course distribution should be divided.
As an initial overview, it is observed that interest in the subject and to gain qualifications was the main reason for the adults to choose education and the least purpose was to meet people. Clearly form the pie chart it is solely visible that the expenses of the course should be divided amongst three subgroups namely individuals should pay the highest and taxpayer should pay few course fees.
Now, the bar graphs specific details reveal that interests in the subject and gain more qualifications was the main reason of choosing studies which ranged around 40% and 38% respectively, whereas for job prospects, enjoyments for studies stood around 22 % approximately as the reason for adult education and the least reason to choose education was to change jobs and meet people which was around 12 % and 9 % respectively.
An analysis of pie chart discloses that the funds which are paid for the education should be divided between three sub categories that is: individuals should pay 40 %, employer should pay 35 % and tax payer has the share of 25% respectively.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer de 67
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, whereas, as for, as to, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03846153846 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79508768262 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533653846154 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.2156936867 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.6 112.824112599 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6 22.9334400587 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266922605142 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147532481565 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349131836804 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170744099 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233305409412 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.2329268293 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.