The charts below show UK and USA energy comsumption in 2000 and 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphics show the energy consumption of 2000 and 2006 in uk and U.S.A. Bodily, there was escalation and regression from both of them.
In 2000, united kingdom had consume the gumption of oil, coal, gas, nuclear p, other renewable sources. Sequantly, these countries consume for 27%, 29%, 20%, 14%, and 9%. Whereas, in U.S.A which got distinction midst of powers. Chronologically, all of its stood at 37%, 34%, 14%, 5% and 4%.
In 2006, U.K there few force dominated such as oil and gas which had 30% and 38%. Over there, the coal, nuclear and other under it finish at 14%, 8%, and 10%. Switch to U.S.A, there some drop and increase usage as well as oil in first position of 40%, and other obtained the lowest for 3% compare to coal, gas, and nuclear which derived of 25%, 25% and 5%.
In conclusion, united kingdom and united State had the highest consumption was in premier year and contrast to last season. The most produced of pep achieved by oil and gas from second of times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 Write a report for university lecturee decribing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 79
- The two chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010. 78
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 78
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for university lecturee decribing the information shown below. Make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
...of them. In 2000, united kingdom had consume the gumption of oil, coal, gas, nuclear...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
...of them. In 2000, united kingdom had consume the gumption of oil, coal, gas, nuclear...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...consume for 27%, 29%, 20%, 14%, and 9%. Whereas, in U.S.A which got distinction midst o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... 29%, 20%, 14%, and 9%. Whereas, in U.S.A which got distinction midst of powers. ...
^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: K
...37%, 34%, 14%, 5% and 4%. In 2006, U.K there few force dominated such as oil a...
^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun force seems to be countable; consider using: 'few forces'.
Suggestion: few forces
..., 14%, 5% and 4%. In 2006, U.K there few force dominated such as oil and gas which had...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...nish at 14%, 8%, and 10%. Switch to U.S.A, there some drop and increase usage as ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61797752809 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36574894797 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4575081699 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0620078108863 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245447889767 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052277778236 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525607973109 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715432635913 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.