The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The line charts below illustrate comparisons UK and USA power consumption from 2000 until 2006. Overall, it can be seen that part of oil was the most popular both of them
Regarding to the data un united kingdom on 2000 experienced a significant increase. The oil Warner the biggest energy consumption each year only contributed 5% in 2006. Contrast in USA just only 30% and 40%, higher than other five category. It was a different calculated of years. In england, there are coal, gas, Nuclear power and other renewable sources. The third segment was gas whilst had increased dramatically about 13%, from 12% to 25%. Followed by coal in UK a similar pattern stood at 14%.
On other country, oil had 40% in 2006, the highest of the other part. Otherwise in America energy consumption of coal it fell to a low of only 7% in 2006, which the most negative on this decade support by gas was only 38%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- The chart below show the percentage of female and male teachers in six different types of educational setting in UK in 2010. 84
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 61
- The pie chart compares the proportion of enrolments on six different courses at a UK collegeof education in 2010 and 2012 78
- The percentage of male and female teachers in six different tyoes of educational setting in the UK in 2010 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...nly 30% and 40%, higher than other five category. It was a different calculated of years...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...in 2006, the highest of the other part. Otherwise in America energy consumption of coal i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55780056885 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0383584949 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860765153924 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356469311518 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592430506979 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700717663088 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525658202976 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.