The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar graphs illustrate the differences among career choices except for full-time jobs of graduate and postgraduate students after finishing their studies in Britain in 2008.
Overall, it is clear that most students chose to continue to pursue higher education; whereas voluntary work was the field which attracted the fewest graduate and postgraduate ones. Units are measured in numbers of students.
In terms of graduate education, there were 29665 students who decided to study further after leaving school. Then, the number of students had part-time jobs stood at 17735 students, followed by 16235 students did not have any professions. Finally, only 3500 graduate ones participated in voluntary programs.
Meanwhile, the number of postgraduate students studied further was nearly 11 times lower than that of graduate ones. A significant number of students did some part-time jobs, at 2535 students. However, just 1625 students could not find a job; whereas voluntary work recruited 345 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-08 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 61
- The table below gives information on average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62745098039 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74165672873 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673202614379 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.230317517 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285224393583 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111621149967 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614969505612 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174644578268 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465505451017 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.