The bar graphs illustrate differences among career choices except for full-time jobs of graduate and postgraduate students after finishing their studies in Britain in 2008.
Overall, it is clear that most students chose to continue to pursue higher education; whereas other types of jobs like part-time and voluntary jobs attracted quite a lot of students and the number of students who were unemployed was significantly high. Units are measured in numbers of students.
In terms of graduate education, there were 29665 students who decided to study further after leaving school. Then, the number of students had part-time jobs stood at 17735 students, nearly half of the total, followed by 16235 students did not have any professions. Finally, only one-tenth of graduate ones participated in voluntary programs.
Meanwhile, the number of postgraduate students studied further was nearly 11 times lower than that of graduate ones while there was a significant number of students did some part-time jobs, at 2535 students. However, just 1625 students, approximately half of the total, could not find a job; whereas voluntary work recruited only 345 students.
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 87
- Topic: Some people think that it is good for people in a country to broadcast foreign films and TV shows. Others, however, think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49444444444 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79856113824 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1676271573 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243283407767 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104354918198 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072045802638 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160028658098 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451861979805 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.