The bar graphs demonstrate the difference of ex-full-time jobs between undergraduate and postgraduate students in UK after graduated in 2008. Looking more closely to the table, it can be clearly seen that the trend of both education levels is similar in many elements.
According to the table, undergraduate students went for further study at 29,665 people where this is majority choice among other options. It was followed by part-time work and unemployment as the number was not significant difference, 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. Interestingly, people who decided to work as volunteer was the lowest, the number of voluntary works was only 3,500.
Postgraduate student also preferred for further study at 2,725 people. However, the wide between higher study and working as a part-time job tend to be shortened as part-time work was 2,535 people. Unemployment were still in third place similar to undergraduates, 1,625 people. Again, only 345 people worked for voluntary work.
In conclusion, the trend between these education levels are indifferent in term of proportion.
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- These days Internet based courses have become a popular alternative to university based courses Some students prefer this type of learning because they do not need to attend lectures Others argue that it is important to study at university Discuss both 92
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52694610778 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0809532517 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9739887236 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146723725734 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583206721853 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612527235175 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810296983095 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527401365018 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.