The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrated the proportion of UK graduates and postgraduates students after graduating from university in 2008.
Overview, further study and part-time were the most common choices to both types of students. Unfortunately, unemployment also showed a significant number after graduation. Voluntary work was the less favorable option for both groups.
Further study and part-time job was the most typical path graduates and postgraduates would choose. For graduates, there were almost 2 third of students choose further study and part-time work while the number of further study students is 29665 which was almost double the number of part-time students which was 17735.
For postgraduate students, further study and part-time work also occupied 2 third of the proportion. In the meanwhile, both choices shared almost the same number of students which was around 26000 students
Employment showed a remarkable number in both graduates. There were 16235 unemployment students in graduates while there were 1625 students postgraduate of unemployment. Both are near 1 third out of the samples. For Voluntary work, it was the less common choice no matter in graduates or postgraduate and it was only around 5 % in both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | jhanvimody | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...typical path graduates and postgraduates would choose. For graduates, there were ...
^^
Line 11, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students which was around 26000 students Employment showed a remarkable number in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58201058201 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98105281742 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.663734658 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9090909091 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156121547521 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745788857992 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525590568871 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116803712846 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04981404136 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.