The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar charts provide information about the number of the graduate and postgraduate students who participated in several choices of job after accomplishing their courses in tertiary education in the UK in the year 2008. It is also worth noting that while whose learners were inclined to keep studying further, they had a hesitation to do voluntary work.
To specify, the highest quantity of graduate students tended to attend at university for postgraduate courses with 29665 people, whereas voluntary work attracted the lowest number of students which only were approximately one tenth the largest one. Additionally, there was a similarity in the figures for individuals who worked part-time and those who were jobless. In case of UK's postgraduate students, further study was the most popular choice among those students with 2725 people, followed by part-time work and unemployment at 2535 and 1625 respectively. Suprisingly, voluntary work was the only job, where just 345 students were involved in.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40127388535 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97473369044 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662420382166 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0213083463 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194178054119 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979866306127 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531735444866 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156716923527 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00762763324089 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.