The charts below shows the percentage of electricity used by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010
The pie charts illustrate the changes and differences in the proportion of electricity provided by different elements in eastern area of Australia, over a three-year period between 2007 and 2010. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that residental and commercial aspects ranked the top in the electric market over the period. In contrast, mining, transport and agriculture levelled off at the smallest percentages in both years.
In particular, when it comes to residental and commercial sectors, the graph witnessed a stability of 28% and 23% in the figures in two years accordingly, which constantly occupied the highest numbers. Regarding other metals, the year 2010 experienced a slight growth of 6% from 12% to 18% in the proportion of electricity.
Concerning manufacturing and aluminium, it can be seen that the percentage shared an equal number of 13% in 2007, then declined marginally by 4% and 2% respectively. In terms of Mining, Agriculture and transport, the figures remained stable at 9%, 1% and 1% correspondingly, which consecutively constituted the lowest numbers.
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- A lot of young people do not know how to manage their money when graduating from high school What do you think are the reasons What can be done to teach them this important skill 89
- Water scarcity is a serious problem in many countries What are the causes of this And what solutions can be done by individuals and the government 78
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 78
- The chart below gives some information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, regarding, then, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38011695906 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27424806428 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654970760234 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1497303303 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194213946792 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770156061886 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108394471229 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113707103673 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104196733378 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.