The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017
The line graph illustrates the changes in the number of visitors going to a Caribbean island, over a seven-year period from 2010 to 2017. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in all researched categories. Noticeably, the number of tourists staying on island outnumbered that on cruise ships in the first five years.
In particular, when it comes to visitors staying on cruise ships, the figure fluctuated between 0.3 and 0.5 million in the first four years. Afterwards, the graph witnessed a dramatic growth of roughly 1.7 million tourists in the figure in 2017, which exceeded the number of tourists staying on island.
In terms of people staying on island, the figure remained stable at approximately 0.7 million visitors in 2010 and 2011 before rising significantly to 1.5 million people in 2013. At this point, the number levelled off at 1.5 million until 2015 and declined slightly by around 0.3 million in 2016. After that, the year 2017 experienced a rise to 1.5 million in the figure in 2017.
Concerning total numbers of visitors, the number stood at 1 million in 2010, then increased steadily to reach 3.5 million people in the last year.
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012 87
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The table below gives information about the level of weekly consumption by different age groups in milk and butter in one European country 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.604208133 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5306852354 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28033575866 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126915391532 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934797197673 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180073488847 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803549007106 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.