The charts below shows the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in the year 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts elucidate the data about the percentages of British students in one of the universities in England who spoke other languages apart from English over a span of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that people who spoke Spanish and the other languages had made the highest contribution of all segments, whereas no other languages and Fresh sectors had contributed the least ratios in the entire period.
In detail, Pupil made a considerable proportion in the French language category and held up 5% from 2000 to 2010. Moreover, students who haven’t used any language as part of their communication dropped to 10% in 2010. However, Scholars in British countries who spoke the German dialect remained stable for one-tenth of the whole period.
In Contrast, some undergraduates in the university chose another language for communication. Their value jumped from 15% in 2000 to 20% in the next ten years. Similarly, youngsters who spoke Spanish occupied one-third of the total proportion in the 20th century, while the same folks utilized the same language for speaking to a value of about 35% in the next decade. Furthermore, the remaining two language sectors witnessed an upsurge trend from 10% to 15% in the overall period.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 68
- The graph below gives information from 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05288461538 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80699658793 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9156479982 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321788393184 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123874375245 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949901654927 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206193439224 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103734113228 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.