The factors that commuters stated for choosing for cycling and driving is what the couple of pie charts reveals.
In general, what stands out from the graph is most chose bicycle due to health and fitness as well as pollution, while the car was chosen because of comfortable.
It is immediate apparent that in, when it comes to reasons behind to cycle to work health and fitness as well as less pollution were the clear-winner by converting 30% of the total. However, no costs was found to be at least front of the chart with a mere of 12% .But ,far No parking problem, there were 2% more cyclists who did cycling to work than those who stated it is faster than driving.
With regards to the excuses for driving, the most individual gave priority to driving because of comfort with 40% ,while least found car safe than cycling. Interestingly, equal strength preferred to driving due to need to carry things to work and it being faster than cycling and 20% masses drove to work because of distance to work.
- People spend too much on family celebrations such as birthdays and weddings What are the importance of these celebrations Do you think people really spend too much 84
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial however most make no effort to do so Why do you think this is happening What are some simple actions that could help the environment 84
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010 100
- The Internet when used as a source of information has more drawbacks than advantages To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uple of pie charts reveals. In general, what stands out from the graph is most c...
^^
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bicycle'
Suggestion: to bicycle
...stands out from the graph is most chose bicycle due to health and fitness as well as po...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by converting 30% of the total. However, no costs was found to be at least front ...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...st front of the chart with a mere of 12% .But ,far No parking problem, there were ...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... front of the chart with a mere of 12% .But ,far No parking problem, there were 2% ...
^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ont of the chart with a mere of 12% .But ,far No parking problem, there were 2% mo...
^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y to driving because of comfort with 40% ,while least found car safe than cycling....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, well, while, at least, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60555555556 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38986414201 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.3136382948 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905529796499 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045222608227 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0162788603482 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521424531686 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133959729084 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.