The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

The following bar chart compares and contrasts the export earnings in five categories of one country between 2015 and 2016. Such changes were indicated in percentages in the given table.
At first glance, it is evident that petroleum products were the biggest export earner in both years while textiles were the lowest. In addition, all categories increased their exports in 2016 with the exception of gems and jewelry.
Petroleum products and engineered goods were the dominant export earner in 2015 standing at about 60 and 57 billion respectively and exhibited an upward trend by 3% and 8.5% in 2016.
Likewise, Textiles -though achieving the lowest quota of all categories- made the largest percentile jump by 15.24% to reach approximately 31 billion in 2016 which happened to be the same amount of money achieved by agricultural products which remained almost unchanged in both years with a marginal increase by 0.81.
On the other hand, gems and jewelry was the only category that its exports declined to reach just over 40 billion in 2016.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...egories increased their exports in 2016 with the exception of gems and jewelry. Petroleum products a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years with a marginal increase by 0.81. On the other hand, gems and jewelry was ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64167902874 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6289762427 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284983197937 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144318241395 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103042172267 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164949165022 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920030540888 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.