The bar chart illustrates information about five sectors' contributions to export earnings during 2015 and 2016. Furthermore, there is also a table providing information about percentage change that supports the bar chart.
Overall, it is clear that Petroleum Products contributed the most for Export Earnings during 2015 and 2016, while Textiles contributed the least. Furthermore, several percentage changes happened during that period, in all product categories.
In a detail, Export Earnings mostly are gained through exporting Petroleum Products, both in 2015 and 2016, in about 60 billion dollars and 62 billion dollars, respectively. Following Petroleum Products, export incomes come from selling Engineered goods to other countries, with the amount of roughly 56 billion dollars in 2015, and went up 8.5% to approximately 65% in 2016.
Meanwhile, Gems and Jewellery export incomes were in the third place for both 2015 and 2016, where the amount of earnings were around 45% in 2015, before decreased 5.18% to about 40%. After Gems and Jewellery, we can see that Agricultural Products contributed around 30% export earnings in 2015, and rose slightly to approximately 31% in 2016. The least contribution for export earnings was made by Textiles sectors, with an amount of about 22% in 2015, before made 15.24% increase to around 37% in 2016.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both the views and give o 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, third, well, while, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4619047619 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83733211217 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3676563424 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.444444444 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298508616526 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149083857313 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043977096788 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20163229696 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036868389372 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.