The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.
The first chart illustrates the number of males and females have been watching reality shows. The second bar chart depicts the percentage of television programme (game) watched by both genders.
Overall, in both charts, in Australia, greatest number of TV programmes being interested by over 45 years old people. Whereas, 16 to 24 years youth have identically same interest. In the initial bar chart, females percentage have been significantly more than in latter chart having equal percentage to males. From 16 to 45+ years both genders having increase by reality shows. Whilst, game shows popularity gradually declined. Although, there have been some fluctuations in both charts.
It can be seen that, in the first chart, nearly 70% of women are being watched reality shows which is approximately 35% more than men (considerably less than 40%). Moreover, most age groups (16-24, 25-34, 35-44 and 40+ aged respectively) have watching reality programmes increasingly ( just over 50%, 60%, marginally less than 70% and just below 70% respectively).
Whilst, in latter bar chart, the same age groups except 16-24 youngsters and 45+aged, have shown less interest watching game shows ( under 40% and 70% respectively). It is interesting that, equal percentage of game shows being enjoyed by watching on TV by both genders ( around 60%). However, compared to initial bar chart females, 25-34 and 35-44 aged habitants percentage is dropped in game shows. In addition, males watching rate is increased, from considerably less than 40% in reality programmes to 60% game shows. Even though, 16-24 and 45+ age groups watching both genres of TV programmes by same percentage.
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 78
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010. 91
- the diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stage to enable adjustment. 56
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010. 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the greatest'.
Suggestion: , the greatest
... Overall, in both charts, in Australia, greatest number of TV programmes being intereste...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...interested by over 45 years old people. Whereas, 16 to 24 years youth have identically ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me shows popularity gradually declined. Although, there have been some fluctuations in b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...watching reality programmes increasingly just over 50%, 60%, marginally less than...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shown less interest watching game shows under 40% and 70% respectively. It is in...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njoyed by watching on TV by both genders around 60%. However, compared to initial...
^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habitants'' or 'habitant's'?
Suggestion: habitants'; habitant's
...bar chart females, 25-34 and 35-44 aged habitants percentage is dropped in game shows. In...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30798479087 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74720551995 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498098859316 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4557371292 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206170418667 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788214592526 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648847590513 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140340787405 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490728035872 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.