The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar chart presents the average number of years for schooling for the adults. While the pie chart illustrates their sharing in different levels of education in Singapore between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, there was an increasing number of years for both males and females in the education over the period. Additionally, an increasing number of learners managed to complete the higher and post graduated education. But males were exceeding females significantly.
Regarding the bar chart, the adult males have achieved gradual increasing in education, while the adult females have plateaued from 2000 to 2002, and fluctuated throughout the next eight years. Obviously, boys were used to learning much more than the girls for all the levels of schooling.
As seen in the pie graph in 2000, just over a quarter of students got primary and secondary school levels, and just under a third participated in high school qualification but in 2010, an insignificant number of primary school students, less than a fifth of secondary, and approximately a fifths of high school have been attending for learning. In addition, under graduated and post graduated citizens had a dramatic increase to about a third, but the correspondences were less than one in ten in 2000.
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 67
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is common practice for some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18 Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teachers 67
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in Singapore between 2000 and 2010. Overall, there was an increasing ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were exceeding females significantly. Regarding the bar chart, the adult...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...girls for all the levels of schooling. As seen in the pie graph in 200...
^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a fifth' or simply 'fifths'?
Suggestion: a fifth; fifths
...a fifth of secondary, and approximately a fifths of high school have been attending for ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22058823529 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9089864279 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.7930634656 43.030603864 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173035946264 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731782393551 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905100489881 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118651922239 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995012363904 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.