The charts show how tourism to the two countries changed over a 50-year period.
The given chart presents information about tourism changed during 50 years in 2 countries – Australia and Germany. As can be seen from the diagram below, the situation is quite changeable in both countries.
During 1960, Australia has received more tourists from European countries (53%) rather than Asia, Britain, and the USA, as well as Germany, had also a high percentage of getting European tourists (45%). The percentage of tourists visiting from Asia to Australia was increasing rapidly and considerably (63%) at the 2010s, followed by the tourist from Britain (20%), Europe (10%) and USA (7%).
In comparison to Australia, Germany`s touristic statistics has not changed a lot, the indicator in 2010 was almost the same as the 1960s according to the chart. As is presented in the pie, statistics decreased slightly; therefore the percentage of tourists from Europe was 40%. On the other hand, visitors from Asia to Germany were risen up and the indicators changed sharply (from 10% to 25%).
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city 43
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015. 56
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 67
- Many people believe that formal “pen and paper” examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ritain, and the USA, as well as Germany, had also a high percentage of getting Eu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15432098765 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80477959906 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8255933226 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11596095579 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697788744864 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113030496645 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104766760456 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929069302326 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.