The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000.
The charts illustrate differences in Internet usage in five European countries and the spending on online shopping in the year 2000.
Overall, the percentage of the use of Internet in Sweden was higher than in the remaining countries. It is also clear that Spanish citizens spent the largest amount of money on shopping online.
The use of Internet in Sweden accounted for 35% of the total, followed by the figures for the United Kingdom and Germany, at 20% and 15% respectively. In comparison, 10% of the Internet was used by French people, which was twice as high as that of Spain.
On average, British citizens paid 87 euros on shopping online while the amount of money used for this activity in Spain was slower (76 euros). At the same time, 57 euros was the expenditure on shopping on the Internet in France in comparison with 46 euros in Germany. Regarding Spain, those living in this country only allocated 10 euros for online purchase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view | |
| 2021-11-04 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 79 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 11 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 91
- The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80981595092 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57604432532 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5866712348 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186007519852 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866931588154 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817806785976 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135216255153 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883703056329 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.