The charts show the percentage of income spent on food and other goods in 3 European countries from 1998 – 2008.
The bar charts illustrate the comparative statistics of the percentage of monetary utilized on eating items and other goods for France, Germany and England in the year 1998 and 2008.
Overall, the amount of money spent on food and good items are more in 2008. France is holding the highest number of income spent on both the items whereas England is in the last place.
On the one hand, France spent 15% on food in 1998 and for other goods is just under 10%. However, in 2008 France spent an equal number of foods and other goods with 40%. Germany spending a quarter of the amount of food in 1998 and only 5% rose after a decade. For the other goods, Germany is well under a quarter for both the year with around 16% and 24% respectively.
On the other hand, England spent 10% on food and around 8% on other goods in the year 2008 and England is accounted for least spent in the year 1998. However, on other goods we can see dramatically rose to 35% in 2008 while for food, only 5% rose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | gagandeep@13 | 61 | view |
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Otherpeople think hat in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology aremore important than History 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, well, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40860215054 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12098648069 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44623655914 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1833663523 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377493748583 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18063508411 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835407566951 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247335948421 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326032375248 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.33 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.