The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the proportions of three different sources was used for producing electricity in 4 countries over the period of 5 years from 2003 to 2008.
It is clear that all 4 countries used the electricity produced by fossil fuel and hydro power. But the producing electricity by nuclear power did not appear in Morocco and Vietnam.
India was the highest country manufactured electricity by fossil fuel, accounted for more than three-quarters. The second country produced fossil fuel electricity was Vietnam with the percentage constituted 56%. On the other hand, the rate of fossil fuel electricity in Sweden and Morocco was extremely low, accounted for only 4% and 5% respectively.
Furthermore, the proportion of electricity made by hydro power in Morocco mostly constituted all the energy produced in this country, peaked 95%, while the lowest was India only accounted for 14%. Then, the proportion of Swede used nuclear electricity was the biggest, the figure was 44%, while India was smaller with just 4%. Particularly, Vietnam and Morocco even did not have electricity produced by nuclear power, it could be explained that these countries had not applied nuclear power in producing energy
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparion where relevant 73
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32124352332 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9319100497 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8792754177 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164786183356 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09161295953 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058388148892 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135160962501 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572060525076 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.