The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the electricity sources manufactured in 4 countries during a period from 2003 to 2008.
Overall, hydro power and fossil fuel were the two sources for electricity generation in all recorded countries while only two countries, India and Sweden, produced electricity from nuclear power.
The chart shows that India and Sweden had a totally reverse trend in their electricity sources. Regarding the former, fossil fuel had the prominent popularity for electricity production, accounting for over 80%. Meanwhile, only 28% remained for hydro and nuclear power, with 14% and 4% respectively. On the other hand, these were the major sources used in Sweden, consisting of well more than half for the former and over 40% for the former. An only minimal percentage was for the remaining category.
Morocco and Vietnam generated electricity from two main sources, fossil fuel, and hydropower. While there was an overwhelming majority of hydroelectricity (95%) in Morocco, that for Vietnam came second to fossil fuel, with 44%. The same pattern can also be seen in the fossil fuel’s figures, with only 5% for Morocco and 56% for Vietnam.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport 24 hours per day and seven days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Younger individuals are happier with life than elderly folks are Do you agree or disagree 73
- An increasing number of people are choosing to have cosmetic surgery in order to improve their appearance Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, second, so, well, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26486486486 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79373189674 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0098557552 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123939461874 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603985656033 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745130293557 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110794701746 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080845282556 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.