The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and how they are supported by their employers.
The given bar charts delineate the educational purposes among students of various age brackets and the amount of support they had received from employers.
Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of people studying for interest increased with increasing age while studying to pursue a career declined throughout the age bands. Moreover, the two younger age brackets received more support than the other three.
People with younger age chose to study for career purposes. However, the percentage decreased according to their age, from 80% in the under 26 age group to nearly one-fourth of that for the oldest age bracket.
The reverse trend can be seen in the percentage of students studying for their personal interest. Only 10% of under-26s preferred studying for their preference. In the older age group, growth continued and reached a joint rate with those studying for a career, at roughly 40% before hitting its peak at about 70%.
Regarding the support they received, approximately 63% and 50% of students from the two youngest age groups had been supported. While the amount continually dropped at the 30-39-year-olds, at 30%, above that, support rose slightly to over 40% for those over 49.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and how they are supported by their employers 78
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 73
- An increasing number of people are choosing to have cosmetic surgery in order to improve their appearance Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The charts show what Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70297763586 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9883315878 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331972480279 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139442809062 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463710613896 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189427465432 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297942805461 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.