It costs a lot of money for a country to host an international sports event, such as the Olympic Games or football World Cup. Some people think that this is wasted money, while others believe the opposite. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
More and more countries indeed allocate financial funds to host international sports events, such as the Olympics or the World Cup. Opinions are divergent on whether this allocation is ineffective or can gain advantages for the hosting nations. Although each perspective has its justifications, I contend there are more benefits.
On the one hand, proponents of distributing expenses for sports events espouse the environmental issues after the organization. At the event’s peak, there is an increase in the usage of plastics and the disposal of organic waste. This is an implication of sudden demand for essential items such as food and water. A standout example is when the Sundown Marathon, whose hosting country was Singapore, happened in 2017, more than 20,000 kg of waste was generated only from this event. However, this is just a single event. If there are more occasions as such, the amount will multiply, leading to the degradation of the local environment.
On the other hand, advocates of holding global-scale events, including myself, maintain that the expenditure for these occasions is worthwhile due to the potential growth of the economy. When these events happen, more and more people spend time and money on participating, either as spectators or sports athletes. This, as a result, creates more opportunities for the locals to run businesses around the areas where sports events are taking place so as to satisfy the increasing demand. This can be exemplified that during the time Vietnam held the 32nd Sea Games, it was reported that there was a roughly 20% increase in the local’s income, especially those residing around the location organizing the sports.
In conclusion, while some people are concerned about the efficacy of allocation for hosting sporting events, I believe that despite some environmental issues emerging during the events, the potential growth of the host nations’ economy justifies the expenditure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Meomeo11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Younger individuals are happier with life than elderly folks are Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...as where sports events are taking place so as to satisfy the increasing demand. This can...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36688311688 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92835365044 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7500331301 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261031181719 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846398765482 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053061356442 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155558222783 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261233793154 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...as where sports events are taking place so as to satisfy the increasing demand. This can...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36688311688 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92835365044 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7500331301 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.071428571 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261031181719 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846398765482 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053061356442 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155558222783 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261233793154 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.