The charts show what the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school.
The pie chart give information about what the students of Australia did immediately after they graduated secondary high school in the period 1980,1990,2000.
It is clear that the number of people who were employed rose significantly from 1980 to 2000. By contrast, the proportion of students who decided pursue tertiary education fell dramatically in the period.
In the year 1980, half of people who studied further, 40% of graduate students had a job after education, and percentage of people who were unemployed is only 10%. There was a dramatically increase to 50% in the number of students who were employed in 1990 and then stood at 55% in 2000. Whereas, students who pursue higher education dropped dramatically from 50% in 1990 to only 38% in 1990. The percentage for people who were jobless fluctuated, the number of people who jobless in each year (1980.1990,2000) accounted for 10%, 12%, and 8% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | marin123 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | marin123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | marin123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | afza tahir | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the period 1980,1990,2000. It is clear that the number of people who were emplo...
^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple who were employed rose significantly from 1980 to 2000. By contrast, the prop...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... were unemployed is only 10%. There was a dramatically increase to 50% in the number of students who we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in 1990 and then stood at 55% in 2000. Whereas, students who pursue higher education d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a jobless'.
Suggestion: who is a jobless
...obless fluctuated, the number of people who jobless in each year 1980.1990,2000 accounted f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11920529801 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01138870118 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7658021226 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0873723445628 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512263716464 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114521625085 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113899898143 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153407148698 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.