The given bar chart depicts the information about the exports of a fruit named pineapple at the International level by three highest pineapple producing nations in two distinct years, 2009 and 2019, and the pie chart illustrates the distribution of the expenditure to the buyer of each pineapple in 2019.
As is observed in bar graph, more than 10 metric tonnes of pineapple was provided by country A in the year of 2019 however, a decade ago it was merely a million. In country B, approximately 5 million pineapples were exported in the first year while in 2019 it showed declining trend and reached at just about 2 metric tonnes. In 2009, apples exported by nation C was just negligible, and the same was after 10 years.
Moving forward to the pie chart, 10% of the cost was the for importing licences while half of 10% expenditure was for the producer. For distribution and retail it was 35% in the year of 2019, but for the profit it was approximately half of the detail prices. 4%, 12% and 6% were breakdown to exporting costs, International transport and Taxes respectively.
Oerall it's clear that maximum exposure of the fruit was provided by country A in finally and highest cost to us for distribution and retail.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 includes French German and Spanish
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below RE WRITE 1 73
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... buyer of each pineapple in 2019. As is observed in bar graph, more than 10 metr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72897196262 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84888879229 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7035435602 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280166314897 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121258711478 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117559153249 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176863757671 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13993146203 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.