The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The bar chart illustrated the amount of pineapple exported from three top producing nations (Country A, Country B and Country C) in 2009 and 2019, while the pie chart demonstrated the downfall of cost per pineapple consumption in 2019.
Overall, 2009 is the year when pineapple exports reached the highest peak in Country B, meanwhile, the least exportation was in Country C. Moreover, Country A took the most pineapple exportations in 2019 whereas the rate in Country C was also the lowest comparing to the others. Furthermore, in 2019, pineapple consumption experienced the highest decline in distribution and retail comparing to export costs with the least reduction.
In 2009, pineapple exports accounted of around 1% in Country A as opposed to that of Country B with more than 4%, meanwhile, Country C showed the lowest of exportation with less than 1%. On the other hand, over 10% of pineapples produced in Country A were exported in 2019, however, the rates in Country B and Country C were quite low, with only 1.5% and about 0.5% respectively.
With regards to the decline in consumption cost by each pineapple in 2019, distribution and retail took the highest percentage with 35%, following that are profit and taxes with 18% and 16% respectively. The remaining proportions are quite small, with 12% in international transport, 10% in import licences and 5% in producer. At the end, the amount of export costs took the least with 4%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-16 | mehaksandhu | 73 | view |
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 89
- The line chart shows the percentage of people living in Australia born in Asia UK and other regions 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 89
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 69
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a Monarch Butterfly 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01659751037 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90494958915 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49377593361 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1589446585 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386727137508 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18788226928 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116995728013 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281553424709 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118962672812 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.