The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019

Essay topics:

The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple-producing countries in 2009 and 2019, and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019.

The two charts illustrate data about pineapple distribution by three countries holding the highest value of producing in 2009 and 2019, plus the inner details about market price per pineapple in 2019.
In general, the bar chart gives some value about export value in three country and it is noticeable that country A hold the top value in 2019 which was outstanding compared to the others. As in the pie chart, breakdown of the cost was showed and we can see that most of the cost came from distribution and retail.
In the bar chart, the value of exportation of three nations in 2009 was about 6 millions tones in sum. While country B hold the top value of approximately 4.3 in 2009, country A had just around 1 millions and country C had only a very small number of around 0,3 millions. However in 2019, country A rose their number to over 10 millions, which was a huge increase and resulted in the top position. On the other hand, country B suffered a decrease and country C had a slight rose in their value.
Diving into the pie chart, breakdown of the cost in 2019 shows us some interesting features: 35% of the cost, which was the largest percentage, came from distribution while only 4% of the cost had to be paid for exportation. It is also noticeable that taxes took up 16% of the cost making taxes become as valued as the original producing value, which hold 18% of the final cost.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-06 Aashish Dhakal 67 view
2023-08-21 Phuong1810 67 view
2023-08-16 folina 78 view
2023-08-11 RTroMT 73 view
2023-08-03 ThoiPhong 87 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out market price per pineapple in 2019. In general, the bar chart gives some val...
^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ry small number of around 0,3 millions. However in 2019, country A rose their number to...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50787401575 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51550157136 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503937007874 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2269003256 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.222222222 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363648966153 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147105577731 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892474070421 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234033600814 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868693675175 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.