Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss
Today, a company is because of its employees. employees and management are the pillars of the company. Company goodwill and success is dependent on the employees. Companies top level management authorities should take employees suggestions or ideas because they are the only one who implements the planning and take out the conclusion. In the further paragraph, we will discuss the advantages of the employee's suggestions or ideas should take by company top-level authorities.
Firstly, Employees in the organizational decision is an advantage to both employee and company. Employee suggestions matter it gives motivation and self-confidence. When employees get motivated it helps to increase the productivity and change the attitude. It gives the employee to think out of the box. It also saves money because the ideas are for free if we take suggestion in the authorities company have to hire a consultation for suggestions or idea. It also gives the idea about thinking of the employees. It exemplifies, that top authorities should take employees suggestions and ideas.
Secondly, it shows the hard work of the employee. It helps the company to think about the promotion and increase in the fair of the employees by which they will be like important to the firm. For example, in a current firm, there is an online app in the company on which employees can give their ideas which help the company to gain and it increases the confidence of the management to hire and listen to the suggestions of the employees. It exemplifies, that employees are important for the company.
In the conclusion, the company should involve the employee in the decision making. They should take suggestion or ideas from employees it will help and generate profit and help them to move the company in the right direction.
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 67
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life Medium to spread news awareness and for some it acts as a companion What is your opinion about this 73
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 62
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 61
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples…. 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employees
... a company is because of its employees. employees and management are the pillars of the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a consultation for suggestions or idea. It also gives the idea about thinking of t...
^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e idea about thinking of the employees. It exemplifies, that top authorities shoul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 295.0 196.424390244 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1593220339 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01305023249 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413559322034 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 283.868780488 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6184796318 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5555555556 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495912537211 0.215688989381 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170625080401 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171957997297 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346971712821 0.15604864568 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151264679492 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.