Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years
The pie charts given below illustrate the percentage of comparison energy production in France at 1995 and 2005. Overall, it can be seen that Coal was the most positive trend. while, other energy was the lowest percentage of all production.
In 1995, the biggest production was Gas, representing just over a quarter off all enrollment, and although it was still the biggest production by 2005 it had improved 0.95% for a decade. At 29,80, Coal was the second positive trend of production in 1995, but it was at the first in 2005, it had moved 1.13% for a decade. However, at 29,27% Petro was the third largest percentage in 1995, while it fell significantly to only 19.55% for ten years later.
In contrast, Nuclear and Other Production had grown a decade later. The Nuclear production had moved 3,70%, while the Other Production had rose 4%. Both of them was the smallest percentage of kind of all energy production. However they had jumped percentage to be a 10.10% for Nuclear energy, and 9.10% for the other energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 56
- The comparison proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three diets 67
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
- Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- Average household expenditures by major catagory 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... that Coal was the most positive trend. while, other energy was the lowest percentage...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that Coal was the most positive trend. while, other energy was the lowest percentage...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ntage of kind of all energy production. However they had jumped percentage to be a 10.1...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...energy, and 9.10% for the other energy.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, third, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64123276846 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0389274297 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165198198959 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776862261585 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695701618855 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12172469953 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447238325141 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.