Crude Oil Prices: US dollars per barrel
The tables compare the opinions of residents who live in the urban area in terms of 6 life aspects education, shops, environment, healthcare, transport system and accommodation in two years, 1980 and 2010. In general, most of the answers were positive about these life aspects, while the “Bad” only accounted for a small proportion in this period.
In 1980, the highest and the lowest proportion of “good” were education at 82% and transport system with 54%. However, in 2010, the highest and the lowest for this category were shops and environment at 81% and 64% respectively. Regarding “Neither good or bad”, the lowest was shops at only 1 tenth in both years, while the highest figure for this category was different, was accommodation with 34% in 1980 and transport system with 22% in 2010.
Regarding “Bad”, in 1980, the highest figure was shops and transport systems at the same 14%, while education was the least at only 6%. In 2010, this changed and accommodation took the place of highest in “bad” at 18% and healthcare became the least proportion with 7%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | dangpnh | 11 | view |
| 2014-06-30 | djongiskhan | 90 | view |
- Crude Oil Prices: US dollars per barrel 11
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and th year after it was refurbished.The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit,during the same two periods.Summarize 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 67
- The chart below give information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...pectively. Regarding 'Neither good or bad', the lowest was shops at only...
^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Regarding 'Bad', in 1980, the highest figure was shops and transpo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25414364641 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16548069045 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486187845304 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4919816723 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.