Destination and employment in UK
Destination of UK graduated is presented in the table, and the pie chart informs about amount of salary in employment.
Clearly, UK graduates destination continuing study and not working rose significantly, while those take full time and part time job declined. Males had the most income earned.
Most graduates chose to be a full-time employee, but there was slight decrease, followed by group sharing their time to study. This contrasted to UK first degree for jobless showed increase to one and two, caused by study, and those without job at less than a fifth respectively from 2007 to 2009.
The amount of salary earned by males hovered less than one in ten, with about less than $40, while those by females accumulated by around $35. Males gained salary at less than 19% by $15, as counterpart hovered at 20% by $40. There was around 20% of male's salary with less than $40, but the one for females contributed less than a third with $25.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-10 | Lewis Tomas | view | |
2024-10-10 | Perry Brian | 67 | view |
2023-09-20 | nhim22122005 | 73 | view |
2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
2023-09-09 | maiphuonganh | view |
- The map shows about the improvement in different area 84
- the percentage of population by race 84
- Population in Oman and Spain 67
- Online Shopping is increasing significantly What are the effects on the environment and the type of jobs that require 67
- The graph below shows the percentage change in place where students lived over five decade 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ng rose significantly, while those take full time and part time job declined. Males had t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...icantly, while those take full time and part time job declined. Males had the most income...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73170731707 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56723972578 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4556713287 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107874829386 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555887163618 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811455373371 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10229986374 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836031750453 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.