Essay topics:
The developments in Happy valley shopping center from 1982 to 2012 is represent by maps.
The modernisation of Happy Valley shopping center within three decades (from 1982 to 2012) is illustrates by two maps.
A quick glance at both the maps is quite enough to make it clear that the spectacular alteration was seen in shopping center between 30 years. However, entertainment realm and toilets were not touched.
In 1982, entrance of shopping center was just in front of northwest lake and behind the lobby area. The top left and right part of shopping center were covered with coffee outlet and sports store respectively. Toilets and furniture store were introduced at the southwest an...
Votes
Essay Categories
Essays by user Jass Rai
:
- The table below gives information about UK independent films. 78
- The given maps show condition of Felixstone in 1967 and in 2001 64
- The graph below gives information from annual energy outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 (%). 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ame the heart of shopping center. In comparison with 1982, after thirty years in 2012, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Toilets
... store were disappeared in this design. toilets were at analogous position. At the same...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25405405405 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71768818526 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6164030019 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.4285714286 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2142857143 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264715349665 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897476214233 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131889387417 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212195928806 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18652849936 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.28 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.