the diagram below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment
A breakdown of stoves improvement in three different styles is elucidated in the picture. Obviusly, each of those design is more intricate along with the times. Interestingly, the more periods the more parts are needed in making a stove.
Initially, people cook using very simple tools, which only consist of stones as a support and tree trunks or straw as to be burned. Unfortunately, there is no anchoring for the cooking container so that something that is placed on top of it must be completely balanced. Besides, cookers must also pay attention to the fire because strong winds can kill the fire due to the absence of fire protection. A few decades later, ancient people discovered a new design as an improvisation of the shape of the stove previously marked by a bowl-shaped flame protector.
Ultimately, there are additional parts to hold the cooking container, also a stove’s bottom material which was originally made from clay become an iron, while the top part uses the same material as the previous model. Interestingly, there is an additional door to enter the fuel, which is charcoal helped by air to keep the fire on and a handle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The diagram opposite shows how a thermos flask works 79
- the diagram below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment 11
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.Write at least 150 words. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93846153846 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90315297098 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.896623791 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0533999353141 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0198606954222 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319567517181 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.030103273646 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264141357414 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.