The line graph presents data on the consumption of pork and chicken in the US over a period of 44 years from 1960 to 2003. Overall, chicken was the more popular meat during the period, although pork was the preferred choice for the first two decades.
In 1960, pork consumption stood at around 50 pounds per capita, while chicken consumption was just below 30 pounds. Over the next 15 years, there was a steady increase in pork consumption to reach a peak of almost 60 pounds per person in 1975. However, this was followed by a sharp drop to around 43 pounds in 1980. In contrast, chicken consumption saw a gradual increase during this period, reaching over 52 pounds per person in 1985.
From 1985 onwards, chicken became the most commonly consumed meat in the US, with consumption increasing steadily to almost 80 pounds per person in 2003. Pork consumption also increased during this period, but at a much slower rate, reaching around 60 pounds per person in the same year. The biggest difference in consumption between the two meats was in 2003, when almost 80 pounds of chicken was consumed per person compared to just over 50 pounds of pork.
In conclusion, the line graph clearly shows that chicken has been the more popular meat in the US since the mid-1980s, with consumption continuing to rise into the 21st century. Although pork consumption has also increased, it has not kept pace with chicken, resulting in a significant gap between the two meats in terms of consumption in recent years.
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the honey bee Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 47
- The chart below gives information about the amount of time children spend with their parents 77
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81153846154 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54247642871 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488461538462 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9790560501 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.727272727 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144276892672 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722147910196 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480774158134 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106833784884 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266963158135 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81153846154 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54247642871 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488461538462 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9790560501 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.727272727 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144276892672 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722147910196 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480774158134 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106833784884 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266963158135 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.