The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparision where relevant.
The table compares and contrasts data on the changes in the dependence of people in 8 different regions on traditional forms of biomass over 27-year period from 2004 to 2030.
A closer study of the diagram illustrates that reliance on biomass is predicted to increase in the majority of these areas with the notable exception of China and most of Latin America.
A series of data revealed that India’s figures (the highest reliance) are expected to grow by 42 million people and be approximately a quarter of total users in 2030 (782 million individuals). In contrast, only 4 million consumers in North Africa used the organic fuel in 2004 and it grew slightly by just 1 million in 2015. In addition, Sun-Saharan Africa is forecasted to experience the largest increase, rising by 145 million users to reach 720 million in 2030. On the contrary, the number of Chinese consuming this energy is predicted to be a significant decline. Figures are anticipated to plummet to 394 million citizens in 2030, a decline of 86 million.
In conclusion, due to advantages of biomass and the consumers’ selection, the users are forecasted to increase in almost regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | Thang Tran | 74 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | billy345 | view | |
| 2020-02-18 | MattNewhouse95 | 11 | view |
| 2020-02-18 | MattNewhouse95 | 11 | view |
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 96
- The diagram below shows information about the usage of boys names from 1920s to 2000s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The diagram below shows participation in leisure time activities by age and gender.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows information about the usage of boys names from 1920s to 2000s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01030927835 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98433576594 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8989613026 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115169172075 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495420598214 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472338377584 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648570502998 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617791341656 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.