The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the evolution of cutting tools which are made of stone, origins from the stone Age.
In general, the tool has shifted tremendously. After 0.6 million years, the look of it seems smoother and bigger than the old one.
Specifically, the first tool, namely tool A, was founded 1.4 million years ago. it was rough, and less sharp when looking at the front. there was no particular shape of tool A, and the length was relatively short, around six centimeters.
The second tool whose name is B, was created 0.8 million years ago, which is 0.6 million years later from the creation of tool A. there is more innovations. tool B whose size is about ten centimeters, was bigger compared with tool A. looking at the front side of tool B, it has the shape of the drop of water. Such a tool is flater and sharper at the tip than tool A when seeing the side view, which may allow better function as cutting. Despite of those factors, it can be seen that tool B is well shaped with clear-cut, therefore, it is good-looking than the old version.
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books, and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi – tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the sta 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is said that the amount of violence on the TV programs has negative effect on our social development and therefore should be reduced.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 61
- Nowadays, the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing. Why is it happening? Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...l A, was founded 1.4 million years ago. it was rough, and less sharp when looking ...
^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...d less sharp when looking at the front. there was no particular shape of tool A, and ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 131, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are more innovations'?
Suggestion: there are more innovations
...ears later from the creation of tool A. there is more innovations. tool B whose size is about ten centime...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tool
...n of tool A. there is more innovations. tool B whose size is about ten centimeters, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, second, therefore, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59685863874 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44708255733 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9556730911 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1666666667 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9166666667 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139383732648 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587266730692 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617792102543 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108086813185 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081775211722 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.